While there is digital disruption across the ecosystem can underwriting, the core risk assessment function of the insurance enterprise be insulated. Various factors are impacting the underwriting function viz. changes in consumer needs, technology adoption, consumer buying behaviour, business and distribution models, and regulations. These are enabling insurers to relook at underwriting holistically.
Segments of underwriting portfolio can be further dissected to explore opportunities opened up due to new business models, automation, straight-through processing (STP), data acquisitions, data model-based pricing, sub-segmentation etc. With the emergence of new data acquisition techniques with IOT, information gateways (medical/ health/ claim/ ratings records bureau), consolidated citizens data etc can aid in automating various manual tasks with various forms/ documents. This information ingestion has been a critical bottleneck for automating rules-based underwriting, risk segmentation, intelligent workflows, 360 degree case management and last but not the least, ongoing learning and rules kaizening.
With the surge in adoption of digital transactions by consumers and also opening of the regulatory restrictions post-covid, underwriters will be able to expedite automated rules based decision-making based on insightful risk scores, quicker turnaround with field underwriting, data intelligence based refinements using analytical propensity, claims, lapsation models etc.
Critical capabilities for Efficient & Effective Underwriting Case Management
Case management and better pricing capabilities go hand in hand, and can deliver profitability only when leveraged with an optimal blend of expert underwriting and data based analytics. Various empirical analysis on expert rules based underwriting have universally sought few key capabilities as critically needed for effective and efficient underwriting case management.
# | Key Capabilities | Why is it Critical? |
Rule Configurability |
|
|
Reflexive Questionnaire |
|
|
Workflow enabled |
|
|
Workbench for tracking manual activities |
Case Management needs a comprehensive workbench to track all manual interventions with auditing capabilities. Thus, underwriter needs a workbench for,
|
|
Reporting and Analytical Dashboards |
Reporting is needed
|
|
Seamless Integrations |
Underwriting needs to be ready for seamless acquisition of data from any third party data sources, viz.
|
How to increase STP cases
Continuous analysis of decisions and pattern of same will provide cues for which decisions can be further automated. This iterative process to add further information (questionnaire/ document) and effect more improved decision matrix (refined rule).
Thus, kaizening of rules is a continuously iterative process to improve STP %.
# | Key Area | Why is it Critical? |
|
Information source reliability |
Reducing NIGO (Not In Good Order) cases plays important role in obtaining reliable information. As the validation and verification of information at source improves accuracy of data sourcing, validation and verification become further easier and more improved rules can be setup. As more validation rules are refined, automations increases and further manual intervention is reduced. |
Decision at last mile |
As the rules are moved closer to customer engagement, downstream decisions making process streamlines decision making and with reliable information improves confidence in system for higher STP rates. | |
Reviewing the benefit vs residual risk |
Need to analyse patterns of past decisions and review the final experience of the same. STP rules that are automated can be reviewed by business for sometime. After a thorough analysis of the residual risk of exceptional cases vs the benefits accrued the same can be decided for automated release. Thus such automated decisions emerge from filtering such exceptions and refining the rules. This is a systematic analysis, gradual testing and phased release process. | |
Effectively kaizening boundary line cases |
It is observed that boundary line will continuously change and shift as there will be new patterns that will emerge from
|
Managing UW transformations
While same may look basic, the correct implementation of the said practices determines the success of the case management in any Life insurance. With continuous insights and quest for improvements, boundary line shifts. Insights emerge with new patterns if monitoring and managing the boundary line cases is effective and very critical for kaizening of rules.
Readiness for collaborating with Insurtech with information gateways (medical/ health/ claim/ ratings records bureau), and abilities to create insightful proposition for niche target prospect data to the extent of segment of one will be critical.
Since 2008 connected devices have outnumbered people and one Mckinsey study anticipates the same to cross 50 Billion connected devices by 2025. This emergence of new data acquisition techniques using IOT, consolidated citizens, health records, claims records data etc can continuously aid in automating more manual underwriting tasks replacing conventional form and document-oriented processes.
Emergence of New Age Business Models and impact on Underwriting
- Disruption is being noted in unconventional offerings where pricing is refined to such a narrow segments based on data analytics so as to offer bundled and pre-underwritten policies to narrow customer segments or to segment of one. The pricing offers can be so created based on the customer data insights and turning the conventional process with refined offer for a niche target segment and is more easier with the digital operating models.
- Another alternative model evolving is on the usage-based insurance (UBI) esp. in
+ auto insurance where pricing models get further refined for the segment and variables are refined to the usage level as you drive / ride. This has been better enabled with use of telematic devices in vehicles.
+ Rewarding the customers with healthy lifestyle, who allow sharing of critical health data with use of wearables / fitness app.